You dont have javascript enabled! Please enable it!


A recent incident involving well-known Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir has sparked controversy and raised eyebrows across social media platforms. In a video clip shared widely, Mir is seen criticizing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi for what he believes to be disparaging remarks towards the Arab community. However, the crux of the matter lies in a misunderstanding on Mir’s part, where he confused the term “urban naxal” used by Modi with “Arab nasal.”

The incident unfolded during Modi’s speech in Rajasthan’s Barmer, where he reportedly mentioned the term “urban naxal.” However, in his critique, Mir mistakenly interpreted it as “Arab nasal,” attributing it to Modi’s alleged derogatory remarks towards the Arab race. Despite the apparent misunderstanding, Mir adamantly insists on his interpretation in the video clip, unaware of his error.

The video clip, shared on various platforms including X, has garnered significant attention, with many users expressing amusement and incredulity at Mir’s confusion. Mir’s assertion that Modi exhibits double standards by simultaneously welcoming in Arab countries while using disparaging language towards Arabs further fueled the debate surrounding the incident.

The term “urban naxal” is often used in Indian political discourse to refer to individuals or groups perceived to support or sympathize with Maoist ideologies, particularly in urban areas. It carries connotations of leftist extremism and has been a subject of contention and debate within India’s socio-political landscape. However, Mir’s misinterpretation of the term as “Arab nasal” highlights the importance of context and linguistic nuances in understanding political rhetoric.

While the incident has generated laughter and criticism in equal measure, it also serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in cross-cultural communication and the potential for misinterpretation in the digital age. The rapid dissemination of information through social media platforms amplifies the impact of such misunderstandings, underscoring the need for vigilance and critical thinking in consuming and analyzing news and commentary.