You dont have javascript enabled! Please enable it!


Winston Peters, the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of New Zealand, has raised eyebrows by stating that Canada has not provided any evidence to substantiate its allegations in a diplomatic row with India. Peters made these remarks during an interview with The Indian Express, shedding light on a contentious issue that has strained relations between India and Canada.

At the heart of this diplomatic spat lies the killing of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, the chief of the banned Khalistan Tiger Force and one of India’s most-wanted terrorists. Nijjar met his demise in a tragic incident outside a gurdwara in Canada’s British Columbia in June, sparking a flurry of accusations and counterclaims between the two nations.

Peters’ assertion that Canada has failed to furnish compelling evidence to support its allegations casts doubt on the credibility of the accusations leveled against India. The lack of transparency in the sharing of information exacerbates tensions and undermines efforts to achieve diplomatic resolution.

The killing of Nijjar has reignited concerns surrounding the activities of Sikh separatist groups and their alleged involvement in acts of violence and terrorism. The Khalistan Tiger Force, in particular, has long been a thorn in the side of Indian authorities, who view it as a threat to national security and territorial integrity.

However, the circumstances surrounding Nijjar’s death remain shrouded in ambiguity, with conflicting narratives emerging from various stakeholders. India has vehemently denied any involvement in Nijjar’s killing, dismissing the allegations as baseless and politically motivated.

The lack of clarity and transparency in the investigation into Nijjar’s death further complicates the diplomatic standoff between India and Canada. Both countries find themselves embroiled in a delicate balancing act, attempting to safeguard their respective interests while navigating the intricacies of international diplomacy.