SOURCE: AFI
The Tejas-based twin-engine fighter (TEDBF) program, designed to meet the Indian Navy’s carrier-borne fighter requirements, has been shrouded in uncertainty. While the project has been in development for some time, it has yet to receive the crucial approval from the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS).
Even if the TEDBF does gain the green light, there are concerns about the economic viability of producing a small number of airframes. The massive research and development costs associated with the project might not be justified by a limited production run. This could potentially lead to a high cost per unit, which may not be feasible for the Navy.
Moreover, the Indian Air Force has shown no interest in the TEDBF program, further complicating the matter. While there’s a possibility that the Air Force might procure the fighter in the future, there are currently no concrete indications to suggest this.
Another factor to consider is the Indigenous Aircraft Carrier 2 (IAC 2) program. If the IAC 2 is approved before the TEDBF becomes operational, the Navy might find itself in a similar situation to the one they faced with INS Vikrant. To fill the gap, they might have to purchase a small number of Rafale fighters, leading to a potential duplication of efforts and additional costs.
Given these uncertainties, an alternative approach could be for the Navy to focus on acquiring more Rafale fighters and working towards their indigenization. This would provide a near-term solution to their carrier-borne fighter requirements while simultaneously building domestic capabilities. Once the Tejas Mk2 and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) are ready, the Navy could leverage the technology and expertise gained from these programs to develop a new fighter, such as the TEDBF or ORCA, in collaboration with the Air Force.
It’s important to note that this is merely an opinion, and the Indian Navy, with its vast experience and strategic acumen, is undoubtedly capable of making the best decisions for its requirements.