SOURCE: AFI

In a significant stride towards self-reliance in defense technology, the Fusion Technology Based Driver Night Sight for BMP-II has been developed under India’s Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative. This 100% indigenous technology, designed by the Instruments Research & Development Establishment (IRDE) of the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) in Dehradun and productionised by India Optel Limited (IOL), marks a milestone in enhancing the operational capabilities of the Indian Army’s armored vehicles.

The Fusion Technology Driver Night Sight is being introduced in Armoured Vehicles of the Indian Army for the first time. Specifically designed for the BMP-II, a widely used infantry fighting vehicle, this system promises to revolutionize nighttime operations by improving visibility and situational awareness for crew members. The technology integrates advanced imaging systems to ensure seamless performance in low-light and nighttime conditions, a critical requirement for modern warfare.

SOURCE: AFI

Researchers from the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT Madras, IIT Jodhpur, IIT Hyderabad, and IISc Bangalore), in collaboration with the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), have achieved a significant breakthrough in materials science. The team has dramatically improved the creep resistance of 3D-printed Inconel 718 (IN718), a nickel-based superalloy critical for rocket engines and jet turbines. Announced on May 7, 2025, this development addresses a long-standing challenge in additive manufacturing, paving the way for more reliable aerospace components.

Inconel 718 is a high-performance superalloy widely used in aerospace for its excellent strength, corrosion resistance, and ability to withstand extreme temperatures. In its traditional wrought form, IN718 performs reliably in demanding applications like ISRO’s rocket engines and IAF jet turbines. However, the 3D-printed (additive-manufactured) version has struggled to match this performance at high temperatures—a critical requirement for aerospace use.

SOURCE: AFI

The persistent tension between India and Pakistan, reignited by the April 22, 2025, terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, has once again brought the Pakistan Army’s strategic calculus into focus. In a recent discussion, C. Christine Fair, a prominent scholar and expert on South Asian security, offered a compelling analysis of why Pakistan’s military continues to rely on groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) to challenge India.

Fair’s central argument is that the Pakistan Army operates not as a conventional military but as an insurgent organization, using terrorist attacks to assert its relevance and prevent India from achieving regional hegemony. This mindset, coupled with the constraints of nuclear deterrence, ensures that groups like LeT remain integral to Pakistan’s strategy, perpetuating a cycle of violence that India struggles to decisively counter.

SOURCE: AFI

Recent sightings of Turkish naval ships docked in Karachi and frequent military flights between Turkey and Pakistan have sparked concerns about the potential ramifications of Turkey’s growing military ties with Pakistan amid escalating tensions with India. As the India-Pakistan standoff intensifies following the April 22, 2025, Pahalgam terror attack, a critical question emerges: If India, in self-defense, were to down a Turkish ship, fighter jet, or other military asset in Pakistan, would it trigger NATO’s Article 5, compelling the alliance to treat an attack on Turkey as an attack on all members? The answer is a resounding no, but the implications of such an incident could still complicate regional and global dynamics.

Turkey’s deepening defense cooperation with Pakistan has been evident in recent years, with joint military exercises, arms deals, and high-level exchanges. The docking of Turkish Navy ships in Karachi and increased military flights suggest a strengthening of this partnership, possibly aimed at bolstering Pakistan’s capabilities amid its tensions with India. Posts on X have speculated that Turkey may be providing logistical support, training, or even advanced weaponry, such as drones or missile systems, to Pakistan. This presence, while not unprecedented, raises the stakes in the volatile South Asian theater, where India and Pakistan are locked in a dangerous escalation involving missile tests, airspace closures, and trade bans.

SOURCE: AFI

The hashtag “India won’t let ‘a drop of water’ into Pakistan” has taken China’s social media platforms Weibo and Baidu by storm, amassing over 230 million views as of May 6, 2025. Chinese netizens are closely following India’s recent decision to restrict water flows to Pakistan, a move seen as a punitive response to escalating tensions between the two South Asian neighbors. The phrase, which originated from a statement attributed to Indian officials, has sparked widespread discussion on China’s internet, reflecting Beijing’s strategic interest in the India-Pakistan conflict and its implications for regional stability.

India’s decision to curb water flows to Pakistan stems from the suspension of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), a framework that has governed the sharing of the Indus River system’s waters for over six decades. The move follows the April 22, 2025, terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 people and prompted India to accuse Pakistan of sponsoring terrorism. In retaliation, India has implemented a series of measures, including airspace closures, trade bans, and now water restrictions. The phrase “India won’t let ‘a drop of water’ into Pakistan” encapsulates India’s hardline stance, signaling its intent to leverage natural resources as a geopolitical tool.

SOURCE: AFI

On the morning of May 6, 2025, India launched a series of precision airstrikes under Operation Sindoor, targeting terrorist-related infrastructure within Pakistan. The operation has escalated tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors, with Pakistan retaliating against Indian targets, closing its airspace, and heavy artillery fire reported along multiple sectors of the Line of Control (LoC).

Below is a detailed breakdown of the locations struck by Indian missiles, as mapped out in the latest reports.

SOURCE: AFI

On May 7, 2025, Pakistan’s Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif (@KhawajaMAsif ) retracted an earlier statement claiming that Pakistani forces had captured Indian soldiers as prisoners of war (PoWs) during the ongoing military escalation with India. Speaking live on ARY News, Asif also claimed that while Indian posts along the Line of Control (LoC) were abandoned, no Indian soldiers were taken as prisoners, directly contradicting earlier reports attributed to him. This development comes amidst heightened tensions following India’s Operation Sindoor airstrikes on May 6, which targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir.

The current flare-up stems from India’s Operation Sindoor, launched on May 6, 2025, in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 civilians, mostly Hindu tourists, in Indian-administered Kashmir. India blamed Pakistan for supporting the attack and conducted precision airstrikes on nine sites, including Muzaffarabad, Kotli, Bhimber, Sialkot, and Bahawalpur, using Rafale jets likely armed with SCALP cruise missiles and Hammer standoff weapons. Pakistan reported eight civilian deaths and 35 injuries, calling the strikes a “blatant act of war” and vowing retaliation. Heavy artillery fire has since been reported along the LoC, with both sides accusing each other of aggression.

SOURCE: AFI

On May 5, 2025, an Indian Navy Boeing P-8I maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) conducted operations over the Arabian Sea, drawing significant attention on social media. Flight tracking data revealed the aircraft’s position at 05:30 UTC, approximately 130-150 km from Pakistan Navy ships engaged in firing drills near Karachi, scheduled from 05:00 UTC on May 5 to 15:00 UTC on May 6. The P-8I’s estimated 350-km surface vessel detection range, as depicted in operational maps, covered a vast swathe of the ocean, extending deep inland towards Karachi and beyond.

This operation underscores the Indian Navy’s robust surveillance capabilities. Equipped with advanced sensors, the P-8I likely mapped not only Pakistan’s naval assets but also activities well into its coastal territory. This comes as a stark reality check for Pakistani observers who, on the previous night, shared videos claiming to have “tracked” the Indian aircraft. Far from being on the defensive, the P-8I’s vantage point suggests it held the upper hand, monitoring Pakistan’s drills comprehensively.

SOURCE: AFI

As geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan reach a boiling point in 2025, the specter of missile attacks on major Indian cities looms larger than ever before. The recent escalation, triggered by the April 22, 2025, terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 26 people, has pushed the two nuclear-armed neighbors into a dangerous standoff.

With both nations now possessing advanced missile capabilities capable of striking each other’s urban centers, Indian civilians and authorities must brace for a potential conflict unlike any seen in the four wars fought between the two countries since 1947. For the first time, the threat of civilian casualties from missile strikes on major cities like Delhi, Mumbai, or Bengaluru is a grim possibility, necessitating mental and logistical preparedness for a protracted and unprecedented conflict.

SOURCE: AFI

Over the years, India’s military strategy towards Pakistan has often revolved around the concept of swift, punitive responses to provocations — exemplified by surgical strikes and air raids such as the Balakot operation in 2019. While short, sharp conflicts may satisfy immediate political and military objectives, they do little to permanently shift the strategic calculus in India’s favor. In fact, a short war, no matter how successful, risks international intervention, escalatory miscalculations, and only temporary deterrence.

Instead, India must pivot towards preparing for a long war — a sustained, multidimensional campaign that would exploit Pakistan’s deep economic vulnerabilities, stretch its military logistics, and force a reckoning within its national security establishment. Such a conflict, while demanding for India, could be disastrous for Pakistan, leading to long-term strategic degradation and possibly a collapse of its coercive leverage.