You dont have javascript enabled! Please enable it!
Archives

SOURCE: AFI

According to a report published by The Hindu, India declined a request from Israel last year for the supply of Indian-made artillery shells, specifically 155mm and 105mm, which were sought at the onset of Israel’s operations along its border with the Gaza Strip and southern regions. Despite growing defense ties between the two nations and the robust partnership between Israeli arms companies and their Indian counterparts, New Delhi took a cautious stance and opted not to fulfill the request for these critical munitions.

In the early phases of its military operations along the Gaza Strip, Israel turned to India for artillery shells, likely driven by the rapid depletion of its ammunition reserves. Artillery shells, especially 155mm and 105mm, are essential in land-based military engagements, providing both offensive and defensive firepower. Israel, which has been involved in periodic skirmishes with Hamas and other militant groups in Gaza, needed to replenish its stockpiles quickly. However, India, which has significantly increased its indigenous defense production capabilities, declined the request, citing concerns over the ongoing conflict.

While India and Israel have established strong defense cooperation over the years, especially in sectors such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), missiles, and advanced electronics, the refusal to supply artillery shells marks a departure from the trend. Israeli arms companies have placed major orders with Indian defense firms for the supply of small arms and ammunition, backed by licensing agreements with these local manufacturers. These partnerships have allowed Israeli firms to access Indian production lines for essential military hardware, a mutually beneficial arrangement aimed at reducing production costs and enhancing India’s defense manufacturing sector.

As India continues to expand its indigenous defense production capabilities and strengthen its defense export portfolio, it is likely to face more such diplomatic and strategic decisions in the future. This incident reflects New Delhi’s focus on maintaining its neutrality, strategic autonomy, and long-term relationships with multiple nations across complex geopolitical landscapes.