SOURCE: IDRW.ORG
The Indian Army’s recent decision to order 2,978 Force Gurkha vehicles from Force Motors, as announced on April 3, 2025, has sparked intense debate among defense enthusiasts. This landmark order, valued in the crores, underscores the Army’s trust in the Gurkha over competitors like the Mahindra Thar and Maruti Suzuki Jimny for its military operations. But why did the Army opt for the Gurkha, especially when the Thar boasts superior power and the Jimny offers lightweight reliability? The answer lies in a mix of historical ties, battlefield suitability, and strategic alignment with India’s defense needs.
Force Motors’ relationship with the Indian Army dates back to 1958, when the company—then known as Bajaj Tempo—began operations in India. Its first offering, the Tempo Hanseat, a three-wheeled utility vehicle, was quickly adopted by the Army for light transport duties. Often dubbed the “pig” for its squat, rugged design, the Hanseat ferried troops and supplies in non-combat zones, proving its worth in logistics. By 1969, Force Motors introduced the Tempo Matador, a commercial van with a spacious rear bed, which the Army used extensively to transport troops, goods, and even large ammunition. While exact numbers are unavailable, the Matador’s ubiquity in military depots during the 1970s suggests procurement in the thousands—a testament to Force Motors’ early reliability.
The partnership deepened in 1971 when Force Motors secured a contract to manufacture Mercedes-Benz TN buses locally, along with the OM 616 2.6L diesel engine—a powerplant that also powered the iconic Mercedes G-Class. By 1982, Mercedes, impressed by Force Motors’ ability to meet German quality standards, granted the Indian firm patent rights to produce a decade-old G-Class variant under its own name. This collaboration not only honed Force Motors’ engineering prowess but also cemented its reputation with the Indian Army as a trusted supplier of rugged, locally manufactured vehicles—a legacy that continues to influence procurement decisions today.
The Force Gurkha’s selection over the Mahindra Thar and Maruti Jimny isn’t just about nostalgia—it’s about battlefield practicality. The Gurkha, a purpose-built off-roader, is powered by a 2.6L diesel engine derived from Mercedes-Benz lineage, delivering 138 bhp and 320 Nm of torque. While this output lags behind the Thar’s 2.2L diesel (130 bhp, 300 Nm in its military Scorpio Classic 4×4 variant), the Gurkha’s low-end torque delivery—peaking at 1,400 rpm—makes it ideal for crawling up Ladakh’s treacherous trails, where high-altitude operations demand diesel’s thicker air tolerance and fuel efficiency. The Jimny’s 1.5L petrol engine (103 bhp, 134 Nm), while peppy for civilian adventurers, struggles in such conditions, as petrol engines are less efficient at altitude and require more frequent refueling—a logistical nightmare in hostile zones.
The Gurkha’s design further tilts the scales. Its old-school ladder-frame chassis and steel body are built to take a beating, shrugging off impacts that might crumple the Jimny’s lighter 1,200 kg unibody frame. The Gurkha’s configurable interior allows quick removal of rear seats for surveillance equipment or medical gear, a flexibility the Thar’s roomier but less modular cabin can’t match. With a water-wading depth of 700 mm (versus the Thar’s 650 mm and the Jimny’s unreported capacity), the Gurkha excels in diverse terrains, from Himalayan streams to Rajasthan’s deserts. Add to that its front and rear locking differentials—offering superior traction compared to the Jimny’s brake-reliant limited-slip system—and the Gurkha emerges as the Army’s go-to for extreme off-roading.
The Mahindra Thar, despite its popularity among civilians, didn’t make the cut for the Army’s latest order. While the Thar’s military variant, the Scorpio Classic 4×4, has been in service for years—boasting a 2.2L diesel engine, 1,000 kg payload capacity, and a spacious cabin for multiple officials—its design prioritizes power over raw utility. The Scorpio Classic, used primarily for troop transport and light logistics, lacks the Gurkha’s mechanical simplicity and low-end grunt, crucial for sustained operations in remote areas. Moreover, Mahindra’s supply chain, which still relies on some imported sensors, dilutes its “Make in India” credentials compared to the fully indigenized Gurkha, which uses Pune-built engines and locally sourced steel.
The Maruti Jimny, a lightweight off-roader at 1,200 kg, seemed a natural successor to the Army’s GS500 category staple, the Maruti Gypsy. The Gypsy, weighing just 985 kg, has been a mainstay for decades due to its petrol engine—easier to operate in sub-zero temperatures where diesel can gel—and its simplicity, allowing field assembly or disassembly. The Jimny’s petrol engine (16.94 kmpl) and compact size mirror these strengths, making it easy to airlift or truck for rapid deployment. However, its lack of locking differentials and lower payload capacity (estimated at 300–400 kg) limit its utility for heavy-duty missions. The Jimny’s modern design, while appealing to civilians, introduces complexities that the Army’s field mechanics might find harder to maintain compared to the Gurkha’s no-frills build.
The Indian Army’s vehicle procurement history offers context for this decision. In the GS800 category, reserved for heavy-duty SUVs, Tata Motors supplied a customized Safari Storme, upgraded to deliver 800 Nm of torque—surpassing even the Toyota Fortuner. Painted in matte black or green to minimize reflections, fitted with bulletproof tires, and packed with classified features, the Safari Storme exemplifies the Army’s preference for tailored solutions. Similarly, the Tata Xenon, with a 1,700 kg payload capacity, remains in service for troop and ammunition transport, despite being discontinued for civilian markets. These choices highlight the Army’s focus on durability, payload, and terrain adaptability—qualities the Gurkha embodies.
The Gurkha’s edge lies in its alignment with the Army’s operational and strategic priorities. Its diesel engine ensures reliability in high-altitude, low-oxygen environments, while its 500-liter boot space (versus the Jimny’s 208 liters) and modular interior make it a versatile platform for long patrols. Force Motors further sweetened the deal by stockpiling spare parts at border depots and offering field repair training, reducing maintenance costs over the vehicle’s lifespan—a critical factor for Army accountants. The Gurkha’s fully indigenous production, from engine to chassis, also makes it a poster child for the “Make in India” initiative, a priority for defense indigenization.
In contrast, the Thar’s higher power comes with a trade-off: a more complex design that demands imported components, potentially complicating supply chains during conflict. The Jimny, while lightweight and reliable, lacks the raw mechanical ruggedness and payload capacity the Army needs for sustained operations. The Gurkha, with its Mercedes-derived engine and tank-like build, strikes a balance between capability and simplicity, proving that in military procurement, battlefield DNA trumps brand appeal.
NOTE : Article cannot be reproduced without written permission of idrw.org in any form even for YouTube Videos to avoid Copy right strikes. Websites doing illegal reproductions will get DMCA and Legal Notices.