Why India’s 6th-Gen Fighter Jet Must Be a Fighter-Bomber

SOURCE: AFI

As India charts its course toward developing a sixth-generation fighter jet under the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) program, the strategic imperatives of its northern frontier—particularly the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) airbases in the Tibetan Plateau—demand a bold rethink of the platform’s design. To effectively counter China’s growing military presence and execute deep-strike missions against heavily defended targets, India’s next-gen fighter must evolve into a fighter-bomber with a Maximum Take-Off Weight (MTOW) of around 50 tons. This requirement stems from the need for enhanced payload, range, and survivability, critical for penetrating the PLAAF’s air defense network and neutralizing high-value assets deep inside contested territory.

The Tibetan Plateau, often called the “Roof of the World,” hosts several key PLAAF airbases, such as Hotan, Ngari Gunsa, and Lhasa Gonggar, located between 1,500 and 3,000 kilometers from India’s northern borders. These bases, situated at altitudes exceeding 4,000 meters, serve as launchpads for fighter jets like the J-20 and J-16, as well as bombers like the H-6K, capable of striking Indian targets with standoff weapons. The PLAAF’s deployment in Tibet has grown steadily, bolstered by advanced radar systems, surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) like the HQ-9, and an integrated air defense network extending into Xinjiang and beyond. Neutralizing these airbases is vital to disrupt China’s ability to project air power over the Line of Actual Control (LAC) during a conflict.

A sixth-generation fighter-bomber with deep-strike capabilities offers India the means to hit these targets proactively or reactively, degrading the PLAAF’s operational tempo and forcing it onto the defensive. However, achieving this requires a platform far more robust than the current AMCA design, which, in its fifth-generation iteration, targets an MTOW of 25-30 tons as a stealth multirole fighter.

Why a Fighter-Bomber with 50-Ton MTOW?

1. Payload and Weaponry: Deep-strike missions demand a significant weapons load to destroy hardened targets like runways, hangars, and command centers. A 50-ton MTOW allows the jet to carry 10-15 tons of ordnance—compared to the 6-8 tons of the AMCA Mk1—including precision-guided munitions (PGMs), runway-denial bombs like the DRDO’s SAAW, and long-range cruise missiles like the Nirbhay or its hypersonic successors. This capacity mirrors heavyweights like the F-15EX (MTOW 37 tons) or Su-34 (MTOW 45 tons), but with sixth-gen stealth and sensors.
2. Range and Endurance: The Tibetan Plateau’s vast expanse and high-altitude airfields require a combat radius of at least 1,500-2,000 kilometers without mid-air refueling, given the vulnerability of tankers near the LAC. A 50-ton MTOW accommodates larger fuel tanks and twin engines (e.g., two 110kN-thrust engines), enabling the jet to fly from bases in northern India (like Leh or Bareilly), penetrate deep into Tibet, and return safely. The thin air at high altitudes also reduces engine efficiency, necessitating greater thrust and fuel reserves.
3. Survivability: PLAAF airbases are protected by layered defenses—S-400 SAMs, J-20 interceptors, and early-warning radars. A sixth-gen fighter-bomber needs advanced stealth (beyond fifth-gen levels), electronic warfare (EW) suites, and directed-energy weapons (e.g., lasers) to evade or neutralize threats. A heavier airframe supports these systems, plus armor for low-altitude penetration, where terrain masking over the Plateau’s rugged landscape can shield it from radar.
4. Multirole Flexibility: Beyond deep strikes, a 50-ton fighter-bomber can double as an air superiority platform, engaging PLAAF fighters in contested airspace. This dual role justifies the investment, aligning with sixth-gen trends like adaptability and network-centric warfare, where the jet could deploy drones or act as a command node.

Scenarios for Deep Strikes in the Tibetan Plateau

1. Preemptive Strike on Hotan Airbase: In a high-tension scenario along the LAC, India detects PLAAF preparations for an offensive from Hotan (1,800 km from Leh). A squadron of 50-ton fighter-bombers, launched from Ladakh, uses stealth to bypass Xinjiang’s radar network. Flying low through Himalayan valleys, they deploy runway-cratering bombs and anti-radiation missiles to disable Hotan’s airstrip and radar, grounding J-20s before they can take off. The 2,000-km round trip, plus loiter time for follow-up strikes, demands the jet’s extended range and payload.
2. Counterstrike on Ngari Gunsa: Following a PLAAF airstrike on Indian positions in Arunachal Pradesh, Ngari Gunsa (1,500 km from Assam) becomes the target. The fighter-bomber, equipped with hypersonic missiles, launches from Tezpur, skims the Plateau at low altitude, and destroys the airbase’s fuel depots and ammunition bunkers. Its 50-ton MTOW ensures it carries enough ordnance to saturate defenses and escape J-16 interceptors, leveraging EW to jam enemy sensors.
3. Disruption of Lhasa Gonggar: During a prolonged conflict, Lhasa Gonggar (2,200 km from Kolkata) serves as a logistics hub for PLAAF reinforcements. A pair of fighter-bombers, supported by decoy drones launched from their bays, penetrates Tibet’s southern airspace. They unleash a mix of PGMs and cluster munitions, crippling the runway and control tower. The jet’s stealth and speed—enabled by powerful engines—allow it to evade HQ-9 SAMs and return across the Himalayas.

The Tibetan Plateau’s unique environment amplifies these requirements. High altitudes reduce lift and engine performance, necessitating a twin-engine design with thrust exceeding 200kN combined (e.g., two upgraded Kaveri engines or a new 110kN indigenous engine). A 50-ton MTOW, while ambitious, aligns with sixth-gen trends seen in programs like the US’s NGAD or Europe’s FCAS, which prioritize range and payload over lightweight agility. India’s current AMCA Mk2 (30-ton MTOW) falls short for such missions, lacking the fuel and weapons capacity for unrefueled deep strikes.

Critics may argue that a lighter, stealthier jet suffices with standoff weapons. However, the PLAAF’s advancing air defenses—capable of detecting and engaging at 300-400 km—require closer penetration to ensure target destruction, as standoff ranges may not guarantee precision against hardened shelters. A 50-ton fighter-bomber balances stealth with brute force, offering redundancy if stealth is compromised.

NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.