SOURCE: AFI
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has witnessed a remarkable surge in the use of First-Person View (FPV) drones, particularly those guided by wires. These drones have played a pivotal role in fire missions on both sides, primarily driven by the innovative work of Andrew Perpetua. While these drones have proven effective in certain scenarios, their limitations and potential drawbacks warrant careful consideration.
While wire-guided FPV drones offer advantages in terms of electronic warfare (EW) resistance, they also introduce significant limitations. One of the most critical drawbacks is their reduced mobility. The need to manage the cable spool and maintain a slack-free connection significantly hampers their speed and maneuverability. This makes them more vulnerable to detection and interception by enemy forces.
The slower speed and less unpredictable flight paths of wire-guided drones compared to traditional FPV drones can make them easier targets for soldiers equipped with anti-drone weapons. Additionally, their reliance on wires makes them more susceptible to traditional kinetic drone protection systems.
While wire-guided FPV drones offer a degree of protection against electronic warfare, they cannot be considered a long-term solution to the broader challenges faced by militaries. The need for a larger army, with its diverse capabilities and human intelligence, remains paramount.
The rise of wire-guided FPV drones in Ukraine has demonstrated their potential as a valuable tool in modern warfare. However, their limitations, particularly in terms of mobility and vulnerability to traditional threats, must be carefully weighed against their advantages. As military technologies continue to evolve, it is essential to explore a balanced approach that combines the strengths of both wire-guided drones and traditional military capabilities to address the complex challenges of contemporary warfare.