SOURCE: AFI
In the late 1990s, India embarked on a landmark defence deal with Russia to acquire 272 Su-30 MKI multirole fighter jets, a cornerstone of the Indian Air Force (IAF) that remains its backbone today. Valued at approximately ?55,000 crore ($6 billion at the time), the agreement aimed to bolster India’s airpower amid regional threats from China and Pakistan.
However, the deal, which involved assembling aircraft in India using Russian-supplied kits, lacked provisions for technology transfer (ToT), leaving Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) unable to manufacture the jets independently. Dubbed the “Su-30 mistake,” this experience has profoundly shaped India’s defence procurement strategy, driving its insistence on complete ToT and local manufacturing under the “Make in India” initiative to ensure self-reliance and avoid repeating costly errors.
Signed in 1996 and expanded through subsequent contracts, the Su-30 MKI agreement with Russia’s Sukhoi Design Bureau and Irkut Corporation aimed to deliver 272 advanced fighters to replace India’s ageing MiG-21s and MiG-27s. The deal included 50 Su-30K aircraft delivered directly from Russia, with the remaining 222 to be assembled by HAL at its Nashik facility using Completely Knocked Down (CKD) and Semi-Knocked Down (SKD) kits. The Su-30 MKI, customized for India with French, Israeli, and Indian avionics, was a technological leap, featuring thrust-vectoring AL-31FP engines, a 1,500-kilometer range, and compatibility with BrahMos missiles.
However, the agreement’s critical flaw was its lack of ToT. Russia provided manufacturing licenses and technical documentation for assembly but withheld proprietary know-how for critical components like engines, radars, and airframes. HAL’s role was limited to integrating pre-manufactured parts, akin to assembling a complex jigsaw puzzle without learning to craft the pieces. By 2012, when HAL began producing Su-30 MKIs under license, the cost per jet was ?100 crore higher than direct imports, totaling ?417 crore ($55 million) per aircraft, as per a 2015 Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report. The CAG criticized the deal, noting that HAL’s “indigenization” achieved only 13% local content by value, far below the promised 60%, and failed to build manufacturing expertise.
The Su-30 MKI’s operational success—forming 14 of the IAF’s 33 squadrons—masked its strategic drawbacks. Without manufacturing know-how, India could not modify or innovate on the platform independently, limiting its ability to integrate new systems or reduce lifecycle costs. For instance, upgrades like the Super Sukhoi package, approved in 2024 for ?20,000 crore to enhance avionics and weaponry, required Russian collaboration, inflating expenses. The deal also exposed India to geopolitical risks, as Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and subsequent sanctions disrupted spare parts supplies, grounding 30–40% of the Su-30 fleet at times, per a 2018 Jane’s Defence Weekly report.
The “Su-30 mistake” highlighted the perils of prioritizing short-term capability over long-term self-reliance. India’s experience contrasted with China, which reverse-engineered Russia’s Su-27 to develop the J-11 and J-16, leveraging partial ToT to build a robust aviation industry. A retired IAF official, quoted in The Hindu on March 10, 2025, remarked, “The Su-30 deal gave us a world-class fighter but chained us to Russia. China used similar deals to leap ahead, while we played catch-up.”
The Su-30 MKI experience catalyzed a paradigm shift in India’s defence procurement, with the “Make in India” initiative, launched in 2014, prioritizing indigenous design, development, and manufacturing (IDDM). The Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020 and Defence Procurement Manual (DPM) now mandate ToT and local sourcing for major deals, as seen in contracts like the ?2,500 crore Nag Missile System in 2024. India’s insistence on complete ToT—encompassing design, production, and source code access—aims to enable replication and innovation, as articulated by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh at Aero India 2025: “No more Su-30 mistakes. Every defence deal must empower India to build its own future.”
This approach is evident in India’s MRFA tender for 114 fighters, where contenders like the Rafale, F-35, and Su-57E face stringent ToT requirements. France’s Rafale deal for 36 jets, signed in 2016, included source code access for Indian missiles but limited ToT, with Dassault shipping parts for HAL assembly, echoing the Su-30 model. Russia’s Su-57E offer at Aero India 2025, promising full ToT and co-production, leverages India’s HAL infrastructure, while the US’s F-35 proposal faces hurdles due to restricted ToT, as only Israel has source code access, per Reuters on April 15, 2025.
India’s push for customization, such as integrating BrahMos-NG and Astra missiles, further complicates deals. The Su-30 MKI’s open architecture allowed such integrations, but HAL’s lack of design expertise delayed upgrades. The Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), India’s indigenous fifth-generation fighter, reflects lessons learned, with DRDO prioritizing in-house radar, engine, and stealth technologies to avoid foreign dependency, as reported by The Economic Times on April 5, 2025.
The Su-30 mistake has reshaped India’s defence ecosystem, fostering private sector participation and public-private partnerships. Firms like Tata Advanced Systems and Mahindra Defence now collaborate with global giants like Lockheed Martin and Airbus, while Bharat Electronics Limited (BEL) develops indigenous radars like the Swordfish. The MoD’s 2024–25 budget of ?6.22 lakh crore, with ?1.72 lakh crore for capital acquisition, supports this shift, with 97.3% of contracts from 2021–25 awarded to Indian vendors, per The Hindu BusinessLine.
However, challenges persist. ToT negotiations often deter foreign vendors wary of sharing trade secrets, as seen with Dassault’s partial Rafale offer. CAATSA sanctions risks, evident in the S-400 deal’s payment delays, complicate Russian deals like the Su-57E, while the US’s F-35 restrictions reflect geopolitical sensitivities over India’s S-400 deployment. A 2024 CAG report warned that overemphasizing ToT could delay critical acquisitions, citing the MRFA tender’s stalled progress amid China’s sixth-generation jet advancements.
Regionally, the Su-30 lesson underscores India’s need for self-reliance to counter China’s J-20 and Pakistan’s J-35, both stealth platforms outmatching the IAF’s 4.5-generation fighters. The IAF’s 33-squadron strength, projected to drop to 30 by 2029 without MRFA induction, demands rapid modernization, as emphasized by Air Chief Marshal V.R. Chaudhari in a 2025 India Today interview.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.