SOURCE: IDRW.ORG
The Indian Air Force (IAF) has thrown its weight behind a proposal to bring the engine development for the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) under the direct oversight of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), according to the latest information provided to idrw.org.
This move is seen as a critical step to ensure stringent monitoring and timely execution of the ambitious 110kN thrust engine program, which is pivotal for the AMCA to enter production by 2035. With four partner countries presenting individual offers detailing Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Technology Transfer (ToT) levels, and workshare percentages, the program is at a crucial juncture, necessitating high-level oversight to navigate its complexities and meet strategic deadlines.
The engine program’s complexity, coupled with its strategic importance, has led to calls for PMO oversight, a mechanism often employed for high-stakes projects requiring inter-agency coordination and rapid decision-making. The IAF’s backing of this proposal underscores the urgency of ensuring that the engine development stays on track to meet the 2035 production timeline—a deadline that aligns with the IAF’s broader goal of phasing out older aircraft and achieving a 42-squadron strength.
The development of the 110kN thrust engine has attracted interest from four partner countries, each presenting individual offers detailing IPR ownership, ToT levels, and workshare percentages. While specific details of the offers remain confidential, sources indicate that these proposals vary significantly in their approach to collaboration, reflecting differing national interests, technological capabilities, and willingness to share sensitive know-how.
- Intellectual Property Rights (IPR): IPR ownership is a key sticking point in negotiations, as India seeks full or joint ownership to ensure unrestricted use and future upgrades of the engine. Some partners may propose shared IPR, while others might retain critical rights, limiting India’s autonomy—a concern given past experiences with foreign-supplied systems.
- Technology Transfer (ToT) Levels: The depth of ToT is another crucial factor. India has historically struggled with partial technology transfers that hinder indigenous development, as seen with the Kaveri engine program. The IAF and DRDO are likely prioritizing offers that include comprehensive ToT, encompassing design, manufacturing, and testing expertise to build a self-sustaining engine ecosystem.
- Workshare Percentage: The workshare percentage defines the division of labor between India and its partner, impacting both cost and capability development. A higher Indian workshare would bolster domestic industry but requires greater upfront investment in infrastructure and skills. Conversely, a lower workshare might expedite development but at the cost of long-term self-reliance.
The four partner countries—presumably including aerospace giants like the US, France, the UK, and Russia—bring their own strengths to the table. For instance, France’s Safran has extensive experience with engines like the M88 (used in the Rafale), while the US offers proven platforms like the F414. The UK’s Rolls-Royce, with its EJ200 engine, and Russia’s advancements in the AL-41F1 series are also potential contenders. The challenge lies in balancing technological access with strategic autonomy, a decision that PMO oversight could streamline by cutting through bureaucratic delays and geopolitical sensitivities.
The 110kN engine program faces several challenges that necessitate such an approach:
- Complexity and Scale: Developing a 110kN thrust engine requires cutting-edge expertise in materials, thermal management, and aerodynamics—areas where India has historically lagged. Coordinating between DRDO’s Gas Turbine Research Establishment (GTRE), industry partners like HAL, and foreign collaborators demands a centralized authority to resolve conflicts and ensure alignment.
- Tight Timelines: The AMCA’s production target of 2035 leaves little margin for error. Engine development, typically a decade-long endeavor, must be synchronized with airframe design, avionics integration, and flight testing. Delays in engine development could cascade across the program, jeopardizing the IAF’s modernization plans.
- Geopolitical Stakes: Negotiating with international partners involves navigating complex geopolitical dynamics, including export controls, sanctions risks, and diplomatic pressures. The PMO’s involvement could lend political weight to these negotiations, ensuring favorable terms for India.
- Resource Allocation: The program requires substantial funding—beyond the ?15,000 crore allocated for AMCA’s Phase-I development—along with investments in testing infrastructure, talent development, and production facilities. PMO oversight can expedite budget approvals and prioritize resource allocation, mitigating financial bottlenecks.
NOTE : Article cannot be reproduced without written permission of idrw.org in any form even for YouTube Videos to avoid Copy right strikes. Websites doing illegal reproductions will get DMCA and Legal Notices.