Pakistan’s Potential Use of Tactical Nuclear Weapons Against Indian Aircraft Carriers: A Strategic Analysis

SOURCE: AFI

In the complex and volatile India-Pakistan strategic landscape, Pakistan’s development of tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) has raised concerns about their potential use in a future conflict. Specifically, speculation has emerged that Pakistan could deploy TNWs to target high-value Indian naval assets, such as aircraft carriers, given the Indian Navy’s robust defenses against conventional threats like subsonic cruise missiles. This article examines the plausibility, implications, and strategic dynamics of such a scenario, focusing on the Indian Navy’s aircraft carriers and their defenses, notably the Medium-Range Surface-to-Air Missile (MR-SAM) system.

India’s aircraft carriers, including the INS Vikramaditya and the indigenously built INS Vikrant, are linchpins of the Indian Navy’s power projection in the Indian Ocean Region (IOR). These carriers, costing billions of dollars, are critical for maintaining maritime dominance, securing sea lines of communication, and projecting air power far from Indian shores. In a potential conflict with Pakistan, they would play a pivotal role in enforcing blockades, conducting strikes, and countering Pakistan’s naval and air assets.

The Indian Navy has equipped its carriers with advanced air defense systems to counter aerial and missile threats. The MR-SAM, a joint development between India’s DRDO and Israel Aerospace Industries, is a key component of this defensive architecture. Also known as the Barak-8, the MR-SAM has a range of 70–100 km and can engage subsonic and supersonic missiles, aircraft, and drones at speeds up to Mach 2. Its active radar homing seeker, 360-degree coverage, and ability to intercept low-flying targets make it highly effective against subsonic cruise missiles like Pakistan’s Babur (range: ~700 km, speed: ~Mach 0.8) or Harpoon missiles deployed by PAF aircraft or naval platforms.

Given the MR-SAM’s proven capability—demonstrated in tests against simulated cruise missile threats—Pakistan’s conventional subsonic cruise missiles face significant challenges in penetrating a carrier strike group’s layered defenses, which also include close-in weapon systems (CIWS) like the AK-630 and electronic countermeasures. This defensive edge has led to speculation that Pakistan might consider TNWs as a means to neutralize India’s carriers, leveraging their destructive power to bypass conventional missile defenses.

Pakistan has developed a range of TNWs, including the Nasr (Hatf-IX) short-range ballistic missile (SRBM), with a range of 60–70 km and a low-yield nuclear warhead (0.5–5 kilotons). Designed to counter India’s conventional military superiority, particularly its armored thrusts under the Cold Start doctrine, the Nasr is part of Pakistan’s “full-spectrum deterrence” strategy. This doctrine emphasizes the use of TNWs on the battlefield to deter or halt Indian advances, lowering the nuclear threshold in a conflict.

In a maritime context, Pakistan could theoretically adapt TNWs for use against naval targets like aircraft carriers. Delivery platforms could include:

• Ballistic Missiles: Modified SRBMs like the Nasr or longer-range systems like the Shaheen series, fitted with low-yield nuclear warheads.
• Cruise Missiles: Nuclear-capable versions of the Babur or Ra’ad, though their subsonic speeds make them vulnerable to MR-SAM.
• Air-Dropped Munitions: PAF aircraft like the JF-17 or F-16 delivering low-yield nuclear bombs, though this would require penetrating India’s air defenses.
• Naval Platforms: Submarines or surface ships launching nuclear-armed missiles, though Pakistan’s limited naval nuclear capabilities make this less feasible.

The Nasr, with its high accuracy and short range, is primarily suited for land-based targets, but Pakistan’s development of sea-launched cruise missiles (e.g., Babur-3, tested in 2017) suggests an intent to extend nuclear deterrence to maritime domains. A nuclear-armed missile, even with a low yield, could devastate a carrier, disabling its operations or sinking it outright, given the concentrated nature of the target.

Pakistan’s military planners might consider TNWs against Indian aircraft carriers for several reasons:

1. High-Value Target: Destroying or disabling a carrier like INS Vikrant or Vikramaditya would deal a significant blow to India’s naval capabilities and national morale, given their symbolic and strategic importance.
2. Conventional Defense Challenges: The MR-SAM’s ability to neutralize subsonic cruise missiles limits Pakistan’s conventional options. Supersonic missiles like the Chinese-supplied CM-302 (used on Pakistan’s Zulfiqar-class frigates) are faster but still within the MR-SAM’s engagement envelope.
3. Escalatory Signal: Deploying TNWs at sea, away from populated areas, could be seen as a controlled escalation, signaling Pakistan’s resolve without immediately targeting Indian territory.
4. Asymmetric Warfare: Facing India’s superior conventional naval strength, TNWs offer Pakistan an asymmetric tool to offset the imbalance, particularly in a scenario where carriers enforce a blockade or strike Pakistani coastal targets.

While the idea of using TNWs against Indian carriers is theoretically plausible, several challenges and risks constrain Pakistan’s ability to execute such a strategy:

• Delivery Challenges: Ballistic missiles like the Nasr have limited range, requiring Pakistan to position launch platforms (e.g., ships or coastal batteries) close to Indian carriers, which operate with escorts like destroyers and submarines. Sea-launched cruise missiles face interception risks from MR-SAM and CIWS.
• Detection and Tracking: Indian carriers operate within a layered defense network, including AWACS, maritime patrol aircraft, and satellite surveillance, making it difficult for Pakistan to locate and target them without being detected.
• Interception Risks: While TNWs are harder to intercept due to their speed (in the case of ballistic missiles) or warhead resilience, India’s emerging ballistic missile defense (BMD) systems, such as the Prithvi Air Defence (PAD) and Advanced Air Defence (AAD), could potentially counter short-range nuclear missiles in a maritime context, though their naval integration is unconfirmed.
• Operational Readiness: Pakistan’s nuclear command and control for maritime TNWs remain underdeveloped compared to its land-based systems. Ensuring reliable delivery in a dynamic naval environment is a significant hurdle.
• Escalation Risks: Using TNWs, even at sea, would cross the nuclear threshold, inviting massive Indian retaliation. India’s nuclear doctrine promises “massive and punitive” response to any nuclear attack, potentially targeting Pakistani cities or military installations with Agni or submarine-launched missiles. Posts on X reflect this concern, with analysts noting that Pakistan’s use of TNWs could trigger a disproportionate Indian response, escalating to all-out war.

India is not unprepared for such threats. Beyond the MR-SAM, the Indian Navy employs a multilayered defense strategy:

• Escort Vessels: Carrier strike groups include Kolkata-class destroyers and Visakhapatnam-class frigates, equipped with Barak-8 and BrahMos missiles, enhancing anti-missile and anti-submarine capabilities.
• Submarine Screening: Kilo-class and Scorpene-class submarines protect carriers from subsurface threats, including Pakistan’s Agosta-90B submarines.
• Electronic Warfare: Advanced electronic countermeasures can disrupt missile guidance systems, reducing the effectiveness of nuclear or conventional attacks.
• Strategic Mobility: Carriers operate far from hostile shores, often beyond the range of Pakistan’s short-range systems like the Nasr, forcing Pakistan to rely on longer-range platforms that are easier to detect.

India’s nuclear triad—land, air, and sea-based assets—ensures a credible second-strike capability, deterring Pakistan from crossing the nuclear threshold. The INS Arihant and upcoming INS Arighat submarines, armed with K-15 and K-4 missiles, provide a survivable nuclear deterrent, reinforcing India’s no-first-use but massive-retaliation policy.

The prospect of Pakistan using TNWs against Indian aircraft carriers highlights the evolving nature of nuclear deterrence in South Asia. Pakistan’s “full-spectrum deterrence” aims to lower the nuclear threshold, creating ambiguity and fear of escalation to deter India’s conventional superiority. However, this strategy is a double-edged sword. As noted in defense analyses, including a 2023 Carnegie Endowment report, Pakistan’s use of TNWs risks catastrophic escalation, given India’s overwhelming nuclear and conventional capabilities.

For India, the threat underscores the need to enhance carrier defenses, including integrating BMD systems at sea and developing hypersonic missile defenses. The IAF’s Rafale jets, armed with Meteor missiles, and the Navy’s MiG-29Ks provide air cover, further complicating Pakistan’s targeting efforts. Investments in ISR (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) capabilities, such as P-8I Poseidon aircraft and GSAT-7 satellites, ensure early warning and tracking of Pakistani platforms.

NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.