SOURCE: IDRW.ORG
In 2023, the International Panel on Fissile Materials estimated that India possesses approximately 680 kilograms of weapon-grade plutonium, sufficient to produce 130 to 210 nuclear warheads. This assessment, detailed in reports from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, underscores India’s growing nuclear capabilities, driven by its unsafeguarded reactors and stockpiles of fissile materials.
However, analyses by researchers like Syed Sadam Hussain Shah and Syed Javaid Khurshid, affiliated with Pakistan’s Center for International Strategic Studies and Atomic Energy Commission, suggest a far larger potential, estimating India’s capacity at 356 to 492 plutonium-based nuclear weapons. A 2017 discussion paper by Mansoor Ahmed for Harvard University’s Belfer Center takes this further, projecting a staggering capacity of up to 2,686 nuclear weapons if India leverages its reactor-grade plutonium stockpile. These divergent estimates, combined with India’s reactor infrastructure and fissile material reserves, highlight the complexity and strategic implications of India’s nuclear program as of April 2025.
India’s nuclear weapons program primarily relies on plutonium produced at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) in Trombay, Mumbai. Two key reactors have historically driven weapon-grade plutonium production: the 40-megawatt thermal (MWt) CIRUS reactor, shut down in 2010, and the 100-MWt Dhruva reactor, operational since 1985. The Dhruva reactor, designed indigenously, remains India’s primary source of weapon-grade plutonium, producing an estimated 12–18 kilograms annually at a 60% capacity factor. The International Panel on Fissile Materials estimated in 2023 that India’s weapon-grade plutonium stockpile stands at 0.7 ± 0.16 tonnes, sufficient for 130–210 warheads, assuming 4–6 kilograms per weapon.
Beyond weapon-grade plutonium, India holds a substantial stockpile of reactor-grade plutonium, primarily intended for its Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) at Kalpakkam. Mansoor Ahmed’s Belfer Center paper estimates India has 5 metric tons of separated reactor-grade plutonium and 10 metric tons in spent fuel awaiting separation. While reactor-grade plutonium, with a higher Pu-240 content, is less efficient for weapons due to increased risk of predetonation, it remains viable for nuclear devices. Ahmed’s analysis suggests that if India repurposed this stockpile, it could produce up to 2,686 nuclear weapons, a figure that dwarfs conventional estimates but assumes maximal utilization of civilian fissile materials.
Syed Sadam Hussain Shah and Syed Javaid Khurshid, in their analysis, estimate India’s capacity at 356–492 plutonium-based weapons, factoring in both weapon-grade and reactor-grade plutonium. Their figures, while lower than Ahmed’s, still indicate a significantly larger arsenal potential than the 2023 International Panel estimate, reflecting differing assumptions about India’s willingness to tap civilian stockpiles.
To estimate India’s weapon-grade plutonium production, we can use the formula provided in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists: Total Plutonium (kg) = Reactor Power (MWt) × Capacity Factor × Days Under Operation × 0.001. For the Dhruva reactor (100 MWt, 60% capacity factor, operating 365 days/year), the annual plutonium yield is:
100 × 0.6 × 365 × 0.001 = 21.9 kg/year
For CIRUS (40 MWt, 50% capacity factor, operational from 1960 to 2010, approximately 18,250 days), the total plutonium produced is:
40 × 0.5 × 18,250 × 0.001 = 365 kg
Combining Dhruva’s contribution from 1985 to 2023 (38 years × 21.9 kg = 832.2 kg) with CIRUS’s 365 kg yields approximately 1,197 kg of weapon-grade plutonium. Assuming 5 kg per warhead, this supports a capacity of roughly 239 warheads, aligning with the upper end of the International Panel’s 130–210 range.
For reactor-grade plutonium, Ahmed’s estimate of 5,000 kg separated and 10,000 kg in spent fuel suggests a theoretical capacity of 1,000–3,000 warheads (assuming 5 kg per warhead and varying efficiencies). The Bulletin’s analysis, incorporating both plutonium types, calculates a capacity of 914 plutonium-based weapons, factoring in an additional 75 weapons from recent production estimates.
India also possesses highly enriched uranium (HEU), primarily for its nuclear submarine program, estimated at 5.3 ± 2 tonnes enriched to 30–45% uranium-235 as of 2023. The Bulletin estimates this supports approximately 130 uranium-based nuclear weapons, assuming 40–50 kg of 30% HEU per weapon. Combining this with the 914 plutonium-based weapons yields a total capacity of 1EEE nuclear weapons, a figure that underscores India’s potential to scale its arsenal significantly if strategic needs arise.
India’s nuclear strategy includes expanding plutonium production through fast breeder reactors. In March 2024, the 500-megawatt electric (MWe) Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR) at Kalpakkam began core loading, marking a milestone in India’s three-stage nuclear program. The PFBR, designed to produce more plutonium-239 than it consumes, could generate 100–150 kg of plutonium annually if operated effectively, significantly boosting India’s fissile material stockpile. Plans for six additional fast breeder reactors by 2040 further enhance this capacity, potentially enabling thousands of additional warheads if reactor-grade plutonium is repurposed.
India’s nuclear arsenal, estimated at 172 warheads in 2024, is modest compared to its potential capacity. The country’s no-first-use policy, qualified to allow retaliation against chemical or biological attacks, and its developing nuclear triad—comprising land-based missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and nuclear-capable aircraft—aim to deter Pakistan and China. The large stockpile of reactor-grade plutonium, while intended for energy purposes, raises concerns about proliferation risks, as noted by analysts like Shah and Khurshid, particularly in the context of regional tensions.
The Belfer Center’s estimate of 2,686 weapons, while theoretical, highlights the strategic flexibility India could exercise in a crisis, potentially making it the third-largest nuclear power globally. However, experts argue that India is unlikely to repurpose civilian plutonium due to technical challenges and international scrutiny, with the PFBR’s output prioritized for energy security.
To clarify India’s reactor output, the CIRUS (40 MWt) and Dhruva (100 MWt) reactors are measured in megawatts thermal (MWt), reflecting the heat energy produced. Converting to megawatts electric (MWe), which measures electricity output, uses the approximation that 3,000 MWt equals 1,000 MWe (33% efficiency). Thus, CIRUS equates to roughly 13 MWe, and Dhruva to 33 MWe. These figures are less relevant for research reactors like CIRUS and Dhruva, which prioritize plutonium production over electricity generation, but the conversion aids in understanding their scale relative to power reactors.
Estimating India’s nuclear capacity involves uncertainties, including reactor capacity factors, plutonium separation efficiency, and the feasibility of using reactor-grade plutonium. The IAF’s modernization, with Rafale jets potentially assuming nuclear roles by 2035, and the development of MIRV-capable missiles like Agni-V, signal a growing and diversified arsenal. However, India’s non-signatory status to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) fuels regional concerns, Some have suggests that India’s unsafeguarded plutonium could yield 500 weapons, reflecting heightened anxieties in Pakistan.
NOTE : Article cannot be reproduced without written permission of idrw.org in any form even for YouTube Videos to avoid Copy right strikes. Websites doing illegal reproductions will get DMCA and Legal Notices.