SOURCE: AFI
On April 2, 2025, an Indian Air Force (IAF) Jaguar fighter jet crashed near Suvarda village, just 12 kilometers from Jamnagar in Gujarat, during a routine training sortie. The twin-seater aircraft, which departed from Jamnagar Air Force Station, suffered a critical technical malfunction around 9:30 PM, leading to its disintegration in an open field. One pilot, Flight Lieutenant Siddharth Yadav, lost his life in the incident, reportedly staying with the aircraft to steer it away from populated areas, while the second pilot ejected safely and is under treatment at GG Hospital. The IAF has launched a Court of Inquiry to investigate, with early indications pointing to a mechanical failure.
Yet, as Indian authorities focus on the technical realities of the crash, a wave of bizarre and baseless narratives has emerged from Pakistan. ISI-backed X handles and several verified Pakistani accounts have flooded social media with claims that the Jaguar was not lost to a malfunction but was instead shot down by the Pakistan Air Force (PAF). These conspiracy theories, ranging from plausible-sounding to outright absurd, highlight a mix of propaganda and technical ignorance.
Taking advantage of Jamnagar’s proximity to the Pakistan border—approximately 200 kilometers—some Pakistani X users assert that the PAF intercepted and downed the Jaguar. Among the more outlandish claims is that an Electronic Warfare (EW) aircraft was responsible, a notion that reveals a profound misunderstanding of military technology. EW platforms, such as Pakistan’s Saab 2000 Erieye, are equipped to jam radar and communications, not to execute “hard kills” like shooting down a fighter jet. The suggestion that an EW aircraft could achieve such a feat underscores the limited grasp of aviation concepts behind these narratives.
Other verified handles have escalated the fiction, claiming that a PAF F-16 shot down an Indian Su-30MKI, conflating the Jamnagar incident with an entirely fabricated event. To support this, they’ve circulated a video purportedly showing a downed Su-30MKI, which appears to be recycled footage—likely from Ukraine—rebranded as an Indian aircraft lost over Kashmir. No Su-30MKI was involved in the Jamnagar crash, and no evidence supports any aerial engagement near Gujarat or Kashmir. These claims seem to echo Pakistan’s playbook from the 2019 Balakot clash, where exaggerated victories were touted despite contradictory evidence.
The crash site tells a different story. Witnesses reported the Jaguar catching fire upon impact, with debris scattered across an open field—consistent with a mechanical failure rather than an attack. No missile fragments, bullet marks, or signs of external damage have been reported, and Indian radar systems detected no hostile activity. The IAF’s rapid response, including firefighting efforts to douse the blaze, further aligns with the profile of an accident, not a combat scenario.
The Jaguar’s track record offers context. With over 50 incidents in its 45-year history, including a crash in Haryana earlier this year due to a system malfunction, the fleet’s age and operational wear are well-known challenges. The IAF has mitigated these risks with upgrades like the Darin-III suite, but incidents like Jamnagar’s underscore the need for replacements like the Tejas Mk1A, set to phase in by 2028-29.
The Pakistani ISI-backed narratives appear designed to exploit the crash for psychological warfare, portraying the PAF as a formidable force capable of striking deep into Indian territory. By weaving tales of F-16s and EW aircraft, these accounts aim to demoralize India and rally domestic support in Pakistan. The use of doctored videos and conflated stories—such as the Su-30MKI claim—reveals a reliance on disinformation over facts, a tactic seen in past Indo-Pak tensions.
Yet, the inconsistencies unravel the story. If an EW aircraft downed the Jaguar, why mention F-16s? If an Su-30MKI was hit, where is the evidence of a second crash? The lack of coherence, coupled with zero substantiation from credible sources, exposes these claims as propaganda-driven delusions.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.