SOURCE: AFI
The recent unveilings of sixth-generation fighter jet programs by China and the United States have sent ripples through the global defense community, spotlighting the accelerating race for air superiority. In India, these developments have sparked a heated debate: should India join the UK-Italy-led Global Combat Air Programme (GCAP) as a partner, leveraging the same engine technology for its indigenous Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA)? Such a move could position India alongside leading nations by 2035, when both its 5.5-generation AMCA and a collaborative 6th-generation fighter are slated for induction, avoiding the perennial trap of playing catch-up in military aviation.
China’s reveal of a tailless, stealth-oriented sixth-generation fighter prototype in October 2024, followed by the U.S. Air Force’s progress with its Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program—highlighted by Boeing’s F-47 renderings—underscores the rapid evolution of air combat technology. These jets promise unprecedented stealth, AI-driven autonomy, and networked warfare capabilities, leapfrogging the fifth-generation platforms like the F-35 and J-20 that currently dominate. For India, whose air force grapples with a shrinking squadron strength and aging fleets, the prospect of lagging further behind its rivals, particularly China, is a pressing concern.
The UK-Italy-Japan GCAP, launched in 2022 and aiming for a 2035 debut, offers a tantalizing opportunity. Already involving Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Italy’s Leonardo, and Britain’s BAE Systems, the program seeks to deliver a sixth-generation fighter with advanced stealth, directed-energy weapons, and integration with unmanned systems. The UK and Italy have repeatedly invited India to join, with Japan reportedly supportive, seeing India’s inclusion as a way to share the $32.5 billion development cost and tap into its growing aerospace expertise. A key incentive for India could be securing the same engine—potentially a Rolls-Royce-led design—for both GCAP and the AMCA, streamlining development and positioning India as a peer to nations wielding cutting-edge fighter technology.
India’s AMCA, a 5.5-generation stealth fighter developed by the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), is on track for its first flight by 2029-30 and induction by 2035. The Mk1 variant will initially use General Electric F414 engines (98 kN thrust), while the Mk2, slated for later, aims for a more powerful 110-130 kN engine co-developed with a foreign partner—currently contested by Safran, Rolls-Royce, and GE. Aligning the AMCA’s engine with GCAP’s could yield a dual benefit: the Mk2 would gain a proven sixth-generation powerplant, while India’s participation in GCAP would provide access to technologies like adaptive cycle engines, which offer 30% greater range and enhanced thermal management, as seen in GE’s XA100.
The strategic rationale is compelling. By 2035, if India fields both the AMCA Mk2 and a GCAP-derived sixth-generation jet, it could join the elite league of nations—China, the U.S., and the GCAP trio—operating fighters of comparable generational parity. This would mark a departure from India’s historical pattern of delayed inductions, as seen with the Tejas Mk1, which entered service decades after its peers.
Posts on X reflect this sentiment, with users like @Prakhar81420407 arguing that joining GCAP ensures India “won’t see huge delays in 6th-gen aircraft” while gaining “huge learning experience” for other programs. The AMCA, with its stealth, supercruise, and AI-assisted systems, would serve as a robust interim platform, while GCAP’s fighter could counter China’s sixth-generation edge in the Indo-Pacific.
However, the proposition isn’t without challenges. Critics, echoing sentiments like @TirthaChakraba2
on X, caution against a full platform partnership, advocating instead for engine collaboration alone.
India’s commitment to self-reliance, epitomized by the AMCA, could be diluted by joining GCAP, where it might be relegated to a junior role, contributing funds and manpower without equal control. The AMCA Mk2 already aims to incorporate sixth-generation features—adaptive stealth, directed-energy weapons, and drone integration—potentially overlapping with GCAP’s goals. DRDO claims the AMCA could evolve into a full sixth-generation platform post-2040, raising the question: why invest in a foreign program when domestic efforts might suffice?
Engine synergy offers a middle ground. Rolls-Royce, a GCAP partner, has pitched a 110-130 kN engine for the AMCA, promising 100% intellectual property rights—a deal Safran has matched. Aligning this with GCAP’s engine development could accelerate the AMCA Mk2 while granting India a stake in a sixth-generation fighter, bypassing the financial and technological burden of a standalone 6th-gen program. The IAF, facing a shortfall of 11 squadrons and eyeing 126 AMCA jets by 2040, could pair these with 50-60 GCAP fighters, balancing indigenous and collaborative assets to counter China’s projected 1,000 J-20s and emerging sixth-generation fleet by 2035.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.