SOURCE: AFI
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), India’s premier aerospace and defence public sector undertaking (PSU), has long been the backbone of the country’s military aviation manufacturing. Established in 1940, HAL was envisioned as a comprehensive production agency, responsible for designing, developing, and manufacturing aircraft and helicopters to meet the Indian armed forces’ needs.
However, recent trends suggest that HAL is increasingly being relegated to the role of a mere assembler, with private sector companies taking the lead in defence production. While this shift has spurred private sector growth and innovation, it threatens HAL’s core identity and raises concerns about the long-term financial and strategic implications for India’s defence ecosystem.
HAL’s historical role as a production agency involved end-to-end responsibilities, from designing aircraft like the Tejas Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) to manufacturing helicopters such as the Dhruv Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH). However, over the past decade, the Indian government’s push for indigenization under the “Make in India” and “Atmanirbhar Bharat” initiatives has opened the defence sector to private players like Tata Advanced Systems, Mahindra Defence, Larsen & Toubro, and Adani Defence. These companies are now securing high-profile contracts, often in collaboration with global original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), for projects HAL once dominated.
For instance, the production of C-295 transport aircraft for the Indian Air Force (IAF) has been awarded to a Tata-Airbus joint venture, with HAL playing a minimal role. Similarly, private firms are increasingly involved in manufacturing components, subsystems, and even entire platforms, such as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and missile systems. HAL, meanwhile, is often tasked with assembling imported kits or integrating subsystems designed elsewhere, as seen in its licensed production of Sukhoi Su-30 MKI fighters and Hawk trainers.
This shift is partly driven by HAL’s perceived inefficiencies, including delays in delivering projects like the Tejas LCA and ALH, coupled with quality issues, as evidenced by the recent grounding of the ALH fleet due to a swashplate fracture. The government’s decision to diversify defence production aims to leverage the private sector’s agility, innovation, and ability to attract foreign investment. However, this risks reducing HAL to a secondary player, undermining the very purpose for which it was created.
The private sector’s rise in defence production has brought undeniable benefits. Companies like Tata and L&T have demonstrated their ability to deliver high-quality products, such as aero-structures for Boeing and Airbus, and have partnered with global giants like Lockheed Martin and Thales. These collaborations have introduced advanced technologies, improved supply chain efficiencies, and created jobs. The private sector’s profit-driven model incentivizes innovation and adherence to timelines, addressing some of HAL’s longstanding shortcomings.
Moreover, private firms are better positioned to compete in the global defence market, potentially boosting India’s defence exports, which reached Rs 21,083 crore in 2023-24. Initiatives like the Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020 and the establishment of defence industrial corridors in Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu have further empowered private players by providing policy support and infrastructure.
However, this shift comes at a cost. Unlike HAL, which channels its revenues into government coffers, private companies prioritize profits, leading to higher costs for the armed forces. For example, private sector contracts often include additional charges for proprietary technologies, licensing fees, or profit margins, which can inflate project costs. In contrast, HAL’s PSU status ensures that its earnings are reinvested into public funds, supporting broader national development goals.
HAL’s relegation to an assembler role jeopardizes its foundational purpose as a production agency capable of driving indigenous defence innovation. The company employs over 28,000 personnel and operates 11 R&D centres, with a legacy of producing platforms like the Tejas, Dhruv, and Prachand Light Combat Helicopter. Yet, its diminishing role in new projects threatens its financial sustainability and expertise base.
As private companies encroach on HAL’s traditional domain, the PSU faces the risk of losing critical contracts and market share. For instance, the Indian Navy’s requirement for Naval Utility Helicopters (NUH) and Multi-Role Helicopters (MRH) has seen private players like Mahindra and Airbus competing aggressively, potentially sidelining HAL’s offerings. Similarly, the DRDO’s preference for private partners in projects like the Indigenous Technology Cruise Missile (ITCM) highlights HAL’s reduced influence in cutting-edge programs.
This erosion of HAL’s role could lead to a loss of institutional knowledge and skilled manpower, as engineers and technicians seek opportunities in the private sector. Moreover, HAL’s R&D capabilities, which have been instrumental in developing indigenous systems like the ALH’s Shakti engine (in collaboration with Safran), may stagnate without sufficient funding or projects, hampering India’s long-term goal of self-reliance.
The financial implications of prioritizing private sector involvement are significant. Private companies, driven by shareholder interests, often charge premiums for their services, increasing the cost of defence acquisitions. For example, the C-295 project, led by Tata-Airbus, is estimated to cost Rs 21,935 crore for 56 aircraft, a price that critics argue could have been lower if HAL had been entrusted with greater responsibility. These additional costs strain the defence budget, which was Rs 6.21 lakh crore in 2024-25, diverting funds from other critical areas like modernization and R&D.
Strategically, over-reliance on private firms, many of which partner with foreign OEMs, risks compromising India’s strategic autonomy. Unlike HAL, which operates under government oversight, private companies may prioritize commercial interests over national security imperatives. Their dependence on foreign technology transfers also raises concerns about intellectual property control and supply chain vulnerabilities, particularly in wartime scenarios.
Furthermore, the profit motive could lead private firms to focus on high-margin projects, neglecting less lucrative but strategically vital ones, such as maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) services for legacy platforms. HAL, with its extensive MRO infrastructure, has historically filled this gap, ensuring operational readiness for the IAF, Army, and Navy.
A Balanced Approach
To preserve HAL’s role while harnessing the private sector’s potential, India must adopt a balanced approach:
- Strengthen HAL’s Core Competencies: The government should invest in HAL’s R&D and manufacturing capabilities, ensuring it remains a leader in indigenous platform development. Fast-tracking projects like the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA) and Indian Multi-Role Helicopter (IMRH) under HAL’s leadership would reinforce its strategic importance.
- Collaborative Models: Encourage public-private partnerships where HAL and private firms complement each other’s strengths. For example, HAL could focus on design and integration, while private companies handle component manufacturing and supply chain management.
- Cost Regulation: Introduce mechanisms to cap private sector pricing in defence contracts, ensuring cost-effectiveness without compromising quality. This could include competitive bidding and performance-based incentives.
- Capacity Building: Enhance HAL’s operational efficiency through modernization, workforce training, and adoption of industry best practices to compete with private players.
- Strategic Oversight: Maintain HAL’s primacy in critical projects to safeguard national security interests, while allowing private firms to drive innovation in non-sensitive areas.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.