SOURCE: AFI
Stealth fighter jets represent the pinnacle of modern military aviation, combining advanced aerodynamics, radar-evading technology, and cutting-edge materials to dominate the skies. The Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, and Chengdu J-20 Mighty Dragon are three of the most prominent fifth-generation fighters in service today.
While their stealth capabilities, avionics, and performance often take center stage in discussions, the design elements like surface area and the use of rivets play a critical role in their stealth profiles and overall functionality. In this article, we’ll compare these three jets in terms of their surface area and rivet usage, exploring how these factors influence their design and stealth characteristics.
The surface area of a fighter jet directly impacts its radar cross-section (RCS), aerodynamic drag, and overall stealth profile. A smaller surface area, when combined with angular design and radar-absorbent materials (RAM), can reduce the jet’s visibility to enemy radar. However, the surface area must also accommodate the jet’s mission requirements, such as internal weapons bays, sensors, and fuel capacity.
The F-22 Raptor, introduced in 2005, was the first operational fifth-generation fighter. It has a wingspan of 44 feet 6 inches (13.56 meters) and a length of 62 feet 1 inch (18.92 meters). Its total surface area is estimated to be around 840 square feet (78 square meters), including the wings, fuselage, and control surfaces. The F-22’s design prioritizes air superiority, with a sleek, angular shape that minimizes radar reflections. Its relatively compact surface area, combined with its diamond-shaped wings and canted vertical stabilizers, helps reduce its RCS to an estimated 0.0001 square meters (about the size of a marble). The F-22’s smaller surface area also contributes to its agility, allowing it to perform high-G maneuvers with ease.
The F-35, a multirole fighter introduced in 2015, is designed for versatility, supporting air-to-air, air-to-ground, and electronic warfare missions. It has a wingspan of 35 feet (10.7 meters) for the F-35A variant and a length of 51 feet 4 inches (15.67 meters). Its total surface area is approximately 460 square feet (42.7 square meters), making it significantly smaller than the F-22 in terms of wing area. However, the F-35’s broader fuselage, necessary to house its extensive sensor suite and internal weapons bays, increases its overall surface area compared to what its wingspan might suggest. The F-35’s RCS is estimated at 0.0015 square meters (about the size of a golf ball), slightly larger than the F-22’s due to its less angular design and the need to balance stealth with multirole functionality. The smaller wing area contributes to a higher wing loading, which affects its maneuverability compared to the F-22 but improves fuel efficiency for longer missions.
The Chengdu J-20, China’s first fifth-generation fighter, entered service in 2017. It is notably larger than its American counterparts, with a wingspan of 42 feet 8 inches (13 meters) and a length of 66 feet 8 inches (20.3 meters). Its total surface area is estimated at around 800 square feet (74 square meters), making it comparable to the F-22 in terms of overall size. The J-20’s design emphasizes long-range strike and interception roles, with a longer fuselage to accommodate additional fuel and weaponry. Its delta-wing configuration and canards increase its surface area but also enhance lift and maneuverability at high altitudes. The J-20’s RCS is less well-documented, with estimates ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 square meters, suggesting it may be less stealthy than the F-22 or F-35 due to its larger size and the challenges of integrating stealth features into a larger airframe.
The F-35 has the smallest wing area, reflecting its multirole design and focus on efficiency, while the F-22 and J-20 have larger surface areas to support their respective roles in air dominance and long-range strike. However, surface area alone doesn’t determine stealth—rivets and panel joints play a significant role in radar reflection.
Rivets are a critical component in aircraft construction, securing panels and structural elements together. However, in stealth aircraft, exposed rivets can act as radar reflectors, increasing the RCS. Modern stealth fighters use a combination of advanced manufacturing techniques, flush rivets, and radar-absorbent coatings to minimize this issue.
The F-22 was a pioneer in stealth technology, and its construction reflects this. Lockheed Martin used a combination of composite materials (about 40% of the airframe) and titanium to reduce weight and radar signature. The F-22’s surface is remarkably smooth, with many of its rivets being flush-mounted to reduce radar reflections. Where traditional rivets are used, they are often covered with radar-absorbent materials or tape during maintenance to maintain the jet’s stealth profile. The F-22’s design also minimizes the number of panel joints and seams, further reducing the need for rivets. However, the F-22’s stealth coating is notoriously maintenance-intensive, and over time, wear on these coatings can expose rivets and increase its RCS slightly.
The F-35 benefits from lessons learned during the F-22’s development. It uses even more advanced manufacturing techniques, including laser-welded panels and a higher proportion of composites (about 35% of the airframe). The F-35’s rivets are almost entirely flush-mounted, and many sections of the airframe are assembled using adhesive bonding rather than traditional fasteners. This reduces the number of rivets exposed on the surface, contributing to its stealth profile. The F-35 also uses a more durable stealth coating than the F-22, which helps maintain its RCS even after prolonged use. The jet’s design prioritizes ease of maintenance, so while it has more visible panel lines than the F-22, these are carefully aligned to minimize radar scattering.
The J-20’s approach to rivets and stealth is less well-documented due to the secretive nature of Chinese military technology. However, early prototypes of the J-20 showed a higher number of visible rivets and panel joints compared to the F-22 and F-35, suggesting that China initially lagged in stealth manufacturing techniques. More recent variants of the J-20, such as those displayed at airshows in the early 2020s, show significant improvements, with smoother surfaces and fewer exposed rivets. It’s likely that the J-20 uses flush rivets in critical areas, but its larger size and potentially less advanced stealth coatings may mean that rivets and seams contribute more to its RCS than in the F-22 or F-35. The J-20’s airframe also appears to use a mix of composites and metals, though the exact composition is unclear.
The F-22, F-35, and J-20 each approach the challenges of surface area and rivet usage differently, reflecting their design priorities and the technological capabilities of their manufacturers. The F-22’s compact surface area and minimal rivet exposure make it the stealthiest of the three, but its maintenance demands are high. The F-35 sacrifices some stealth for versatility, using a smaller wing area and advanced manufacturing to keep rivets and seams from compromising its RCS. The J-20, with its larger surface area and initially less refined construction, may struggle to match the stealth of its American counterparts, though recent improvements suggest China is closing the gap.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.