SOURCE: AFI
On January 20, 2009, as Barack Obama was sworn in as the 44th President of the United States, an unexpected event unfolded thousands of miles away at the Indian Army’s Pokhran range in Rajasthan. A test of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, a flagship product of India’s defense collaboration with Russia, failed to hit its intended target.
According to officials from the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), the missile’s Global Positioning System (GPS) guidance “blanked out” during the test, causing it to veer off course. The incident, while initially attributed to technical glitches, revealed a deeper vulnerability in India’s reliance on foreign satellite navigation systems and underscored the urgent need for an indigenous alternative.
DRDO officials later revealed that the missile’s GPS guidance system failed mid-flight, causing it to lose its positional reference. As a result, the BrahMos traveled for 112 seconds—28 seconds longer than intended—and fell 7 kilometers away from the target. While no injuries or significant damage were reported, the miss was a stark reminder of the limitations imposed by dependency on external systems, particularly the American GPS constellation, which has become a cornerstone of modern navigation for militaries worldwide.
The timing of the failure raised eyebrows within India’s defense establishment. January 20, 2009, coincided with Barack Obama’s inauguration, a high-profile event that drew global attention. DRDO officials noted that the American GPS satellites, which the BrahMos relied upon for mid-course navigation, had been “switched off” during the test window. While they stopped short of alleging deliberate interference, they acknowledged that it was technically possible for the U.S. to selectively disable GPS signals in specific regions or for specific users.
At the time, the GPS system—operated by the U.S. Department of Defense—provided two levels of service: a Standard Positioning Service (SPS) for civilian use and a Precise Positioning Service (PPS) for military applications. Even military-grade GPS signals, like those potentially used by the BrahMos, could be degraded or denied through selective availability (SA), a mechanism that allows the U.S. to control access during sensitive periods. While SA was officially discontinued in 2000, the U.S. retains the ability to regionally disrupt GPS signals, especially during events of national importance or in response to perceived security threats.
Whether the GPS blackout during Obama’s inauguration was a deliberate test to gauge India’s missile capabilities without U.S. support remains speculative. DRDO officials refrained from making definitive claims, but the possibility lingered in their assessments. “It’s possible to switch off GPS-linked satellites selectively,” one official told media outlets, adding that the incident highlighted a critical vulnerability in India’s missile program.
The BrahMos test failure served as a sobering lesson for India’s defense planners. While the missile’s onboard inertial navigation system (INS) provided some degree of guidance, it was not sufficient to compensate for the loss of GPS data during the flight. The INS, which relies on gyroscopes and accelerometers to track position, accumulates errors over time—a phenomenon known as drift—making it less reliable for long-range precision strikes without external corrections from satellite navigation.
The incident underscored the risks of depending on foreign satellite constellations, whether American (GPS) or Russian (GLONASS), for critical military applications. Both systems, while accessible, are controlled by their respective governments and can be manipulated or disabled at will. For a country like India, which faces multifaceted security challenges and operates in a geopolitically volatile region, such dependency poses a strategic liability. “The failure of the mission has underlined the need for India to have its own GPS-linked satellites instead of depending on American or Russian constellations,” a DRDO official remarked in the aftermath.
The BrahMos test failure added urgency to India’s efforts to develop its own satellite navigation system. At the time, the Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS), later renamed Navigation with Indian Constellation (NavIC), was still in its conceptual phase. The Pokhran incident galvanized support for the program, emphasizing the need for self-reliance in navigation technology.
NavIC, developed by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), was designed to provide accurate positioning and timing services over India and a region extending 1,500 km around its borders. Unlike GPS, which offers global coverage but is subject to U.S. control, NavIC would ensure uninterrupted access to navigation data for India’s military and civilian applications. The system comprises a constellation of seven satellites—three in geostationary orbit and four in geosynchronous orbit—offering both a Standard Positioning Service (SPS) for civilian use and a Restricted Service (RS) for authorized users, including the military.
The first NavIC satellite, IRNSS-1A, was launched in July 2013, four years after the BrahMos test failure. The full constellation was completed by April 2018, providing India with an independent navigation system capable of supporting precision-guided munitions, missile systems, and other defense applications. NavIC offers positional accuracy of better than 20 meters in its primary coverage area and is immune to external disruptions, making it a cornerstone of India’s strategic autonomy.
The 2009 BrahMos test failure, while a setback, proved to be a catalyst for introspection and reform within India’s defense ecosystem. It highlighted the risks of over-reliance on foreign technologies and prompted a renewed focus on indigenous development. Subsequent BrahMos tests incorporated lessons from the incident, with the missile achieving greater reliability through improved inertial navigation and integration with alternative guidance systems like GLONASS and, later, NavIC.
Beyond the BrahMos program, the incident influenced India’s broader approach to defense technology. It reinforced the importance of self-sufficiency in critical areas like navigation, communication, and propulsion, where external dependencies could compromise national security. The development of NavIC, alongside other indigenous systems like the Indian Regional Positioning System (IRPS) for missile guidance, reflects India’s determination to reduce vulnerabilities and build a robust defense infrastructure.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.