SOURCE: AFI
The Sukhoi Su-30MKI Flanker and Su-57 Felon, two of Russia’s most prominent fighter jets, offer a revealing side-by-side comparison that underscores both the lineage and limitations of modern Russian aerospace engineering. While the Su-57, Russia’s first fifth-generation stealth fighter, draws clear design inspiration from the Su-30MKI—a 4.5-generation multirole platform tailored for India—it also exposes a deeper narrative: the Russian Aircraft Design Bureau’s apparent inability or unwillingness to break free from the foundational Su-27 architecture of the 1970s.
The Su-57’s lineage from the Su-30MKI is unmistakable. Both aircraft share a canard-delta wing configuration, a legacy of the Su-27’s focus on agility, though the Su-57’s canards are smaller and integrated into its stealth profile. The Felon’s thrust-vectoring nozzles, a defining trait of the Su-30MKI, enhance post-stall maneuverability—a feature prized by Russian designers since the 1980s but less emphasized in Western stealth fighters like the F-22, which prioritize low observability over aerobatics. The Su-57’s wider fuselage and splayed engine nacelles also mirror the Su-30MKI’s layout, adapted to house internal bays and reduce radar cross-section (RCS), estimated at 0.1–1 m² compared to the Su-30MKI’s 20 m².
Yet, this inspiration reveals a paradox. While the Su-30MKI was a 1990s adaptation of a 1970s platform, optimized for multirole versatility, the Su-57’s adherence to the same blueprint questions its fifth-generation credentials. The Felon’s stealth is compromised by exposed engine blades (visible to radar), protruding sensors, and riveted panels—flaws absent in the F-35 or F-22, which boast RCS values below 0.001 m². The Su-57’s reliance on Su-30MKI-inspired aerodynamics, rather than a radical redesign like China’s J-20, suggests Sukhoi prioritized cost and familiarity over groundbreaking innovation.
This comparison exposes a broader critique: Russia’s aerospace design philosophy appears trapped in an 1980s mindset, tethered to the Su-27’s Cold War legacy. The Su-27, first flown in 1977, spawned a family of jets—Su-30, Su-35, Su-37—each iterating on its core strengths: agility, range, and payload. The Su-30MKI, built by Irkut Corporation under Sukhoi’s aegis, exemplifies this evolution, blending Russian airframes with French, Israeli, and Indian systems. The Su-35, a 4.5-generation upgrade, further refined this formula with modern avionics and the Irbis-E radar, yet retained the Flanker’s silhouette.
The Su-57, despite its stealth ambitions, follows the same playbook. Its development, launched as the PAK FA (Future Air Complex for Tactical Aviation) in 2002, aimed to rival the F-22 but faltered amid funding shortages and technical hurdles. By 2025, only 22 serial aircraft have been delivered to the Russian Aerospace Forces, far below the 76 planned by 2028, with production stymied by sanctions post-Ukraine invasion and reliance on interim AL-41F1 engines (lacking the supercruise-capable Izdeliye 30). Posts on X from early 2025 note that the Su-57’s unit cost—around $40–50 million—pales against the F-35’s $80 million, reflecting both efficiency and underinvestment in transformative technologies.
Critics argue this reflects not just budgetary constraints but a philosophical rut. Unlike the U.S., which transitioned from the F-15 to the stealth-centric F-22, or China, which leapt to the J-20’s tailless design, Russia has doubled down on Flanker-derived platforms. The Su-57’s lack of a helmet-mounted display (standard in Western jets since the 2000s), its semi-recessed weapons bays (compromising stealth), and dependence on external targeting pods echo 1980s design compromises, not 21st-century innovation. Whether due to a lack of funds—Russia’s defence budget is $100 billion annually versus the U.S.’s $800 billion—or a reluctance to abandon proven designs, Sukhoi’s output feels like a modernized relic.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.