SOURCE: AFI
Commodore Anil Jai Singh, a seasoned naval veteran and Vice President of the Indian Maritime Foundation, has expressed his disappointment over the recent decision to limit India’s nuclear submarine program to just two vessels. He argues that a program encompassing six submarines, built in tranches of two or three, would have provided numerous benefits to the Indian Navy and the domestic defense industry.
By opting for a smaller program, the Indian Navy may face challenges in maintaining operational readiness and sustaining a credible deterrent posture. A fleet of six submarines would have offered greater flexibility and resilience, allowing for routine maintenance and upgrades without compromising operational capabilities.
A larger program would have significantly boosted the Indian defense industry, providing a long-term pipeline of work and encouraging investments in advanced technologies. By engaging a larger number of companies, the government could have fostered competition, driving innovation and cost reduction.
India’s geopolitical position demands a strong naval presence, particularly in the Indian Ocean region. A larger fleet of nuclear submarines would have enhanced India’s ability to project power and safeguard its maritime interests. It would have also served as a powerful deterrent against potential adversaries.
While the decision to limit the nuclear submarine program is understandable given budgetary constraints and other factors, it is essential to reassess this strategy in the long term. A robust and modernized Indian Navy is crucial for safeguarding the nation’s maritime security and economic interests.