SOURCE: AFI
The Indian Air Force (IAF) is reportedly losing confidence in Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), the state-owned aerospace giant tasked with producing fighter jets to bolster India’s air power. This erosion of trust, emerging stems from persistent delays, quality concerns, and HAL’s struggles to meet the IAF’s operational timelines—issues that threaten India’s defense preparedness at a time of heightened regional tensions.
With the IAF’s squadron strength dwindling and indigenous programs like the Tejas facing setbacks, this rift signals a critical juncture for India’s aerospace ecosystem. Experts and observers argue that urgent intervention from the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) is essential to overhaul HAL, ensuring it aligns with the nation’s strategic imperatives under the “Make in India” and “Aatmanirbhar Bharat” initiatives.
HAL has been the IAF’s primary supplier of fighter jets for decades, delivering platforms like the MiG-21, Jaguar, and Su-30 MKI under license from foreign OEMs, alongside indigenous designs like the Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) Tejas. However, recent developments suggest a growing rift. The IAF, currently operating at 31 squadrons against a sanctioned strength of 42.5, relies heavily on HAL to bridge this gap with timely deliveries of Tejas Mk-1A jets and future variants like the Mk-2 and Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA). Yet, HAL’s track record has fueled frustration.
The Tejas Mk-1A program, a cornerstone of India’s indigenous fighter ambitions, exemplifies these tensions. In February 2021, the Cabinet Committee on Security approved a Rs 48,000 crore contract for 83 Mk-1A jets, with deliveries slated to begin in March 2024. As of March 2025, HAL has delivered only 2–3 aircraft, citing supply chain delays, integration issues with the EL/M-2052 AESA radar, and challenges in scaling production beyond its current capacity of 8 jets annually. The IAF, facing obsolescence of its MiG-21 and MiG-27 fleets, had banked on 16–20 jets per year—a target HAL has consistently missed, prompting the Air Force to explore foreign options like the Rafale and reconsider its faith in domestic production.
Beyond delays, quality concerns have deepened the IAF’s skepticism. Posts on X and reports from early 2025 highlight incidents of Tejas jets returning with technical snags during trials, raising questions about HAL’s quality assurance processes. A senior IAF official, speaking anonymously to The Hindu, remarked, “We cannot afford to induct aircraft that need constant troubleshooting when we’re already stretched thin.” This echoes past critiques, such as the 2016 CAG report on the Su-30 MKI, which noted HAL-assembled jets had lower reliability than Russian imports due to manufacturing inconsistencies.
The Light Utility Helicopter (LUH) saga, detailed by former Navy test pilot Capt K.P. Sanjeev Kumar in his March 2025 blog, further stokes these concerns. A veteran HAL test pilot flagged critical autorotation and stability flaws, yet the company secured Initial Operational Clearance (IOC) in 2020 and showcased the LUH at Aero India 2025—moves the IAF now views with suspicion. If HAL’s fighter jet programs mirror this pattern, the implications for combat readiness are dire.
The IAF’s waning trust in HAL is not just a logistical issue—it’s a strategic red flag. India’s defense policy hinges on self-reliance to counter threats from China and Pakistan, both boasting modern air forces (J-20 and J-10C, respectively). The Tejas Mk-1A, with its 4.5-generation capabilities, is meant to replace aging MiGs and complement the Su-30 and Rafale fleets. The Mk-2, a heavier 17.5-ton fighter with GE F414 engines, and the stealth AMCA are pivotal for future deterrence, yet HAL’s sluggish pace—Mk-2’s first flight is delayed to 2027, AMCA to 2032—jeopardizes these goals.
This faltering faith risks derailing “Make in India.” Private players like Tata Advanced Systems and Kalyani Group are stepping up—supplying C295 airframes and Airbus landing gears—but HAL remains the linchpin for fighter jets. If the IAF turns to imports, as seen with the 36 Rafale jets acquired in 2016, India’s indigenous ecosystem could stagnate, undermining decades of investment in the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA) and HAL.
Why PMO Intervention Is Crucial
The stakes are too high for this rift to fester. The PMO, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, must step in to enforce sweeping reforms at HAL. Experts suggest several imperatives:
- Leadership Overhaul: Appoint a technocrat with proven industry experience as HAL’s Chairman, replacing the current bureaucratic mold, to instill accountability and innovation.
- Production Capacity Boost: Expand HAL’s facilities beyond Bengaluru and Nashik, partnering with private firms to achieve a 20-jet annual output—matching global benchmarks like Dassault’s Rafale line.
- Quality Assurance Revamp: Establish an independent oversight body, potentially under the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), to audit HAL’s processes and align them with IAF standards.
- Timeline Enforcement: Set binding deadlines for Tejas deliveries (e.g., 40 Mk-1A jets by 2027) with penalties for delays, incentivizing efficiency.
- Private Sector Integration: Leverage Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to offload subsystems production—engines, avionics—to firms like Bharat Forge or Mahindra, freeing HAL to focus on assembly and integration.
The PMO’s track record offers hope. Its intervention in 2021 fast-tracked the LCA contract, and its push for DRDO reforms has streamlined missile programs like Agni and BrahMos. A similar hands-on approach could realign HAL with the IAF’s needs, restoring trust and accelerating India’s fighter jet pipeline.
The IAF’s impatience is amplified by regional dynamics. China’s PLAAF fields over 150 J-20 stealth fighters, while Pakistan’s JF-17 Block III and potential J-31 acquisitions narrow India’s edge. With only 31 squadrons—down from 35 in 2016—the IAF faces a 200-fighter shortfall by 2030 if HAL falters. Foreign procurements, like the Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft (MRFA) tender for 114 jets, remain stalled, leaving indigenous production as the linchpin. A dysfunctional HAL risks forcing India into costlier imports, straining budgets and diluting strategic autonomy.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.