SOURCE: AFI
Unlike other fighters like the Rafale or Su-30MKI, the F-35 isn’t designed to operate independently. It relies heavily on an ecosystem of software, data-sharing networks, and logistical support that is entirely controlled by the United States. This means India wouldn’t just be buying a plane; it would be locking itself into a complex, costly, and highly controlled American military-industrial system.
One of the biggest concerns is the Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS), now being replaced by ODIN. This cloud-based system manages maintenance, mission planning, and logistics for all F-35s worldwide. However, it is controlled by Lockheed Martin and the US Department of Defense, making every aspect of the jet’s operations reliant on American approval. Even close US allies like Australia and the UK have faced delays in getting ALIS approvals, raising concerns about operational independence.
The case of Israel’s F-35I “Adir” is particularly relevant. While Israel has been given more flexibility than other operators, even its highly customized variant still relies on ALIS for core maintenance and operational functions. This means that no country, not even a strategic partner like Israel, has full autonomy over the F-35’s logistical ecosystem. If India were to acquire the jet, it would permanently tie its air force operations to American oversight.
Beyond logistics, the F-35 is also deeply dependent on American weapons systems. The aircraft is primarily designed to operate with AIM-120 AMRAAMs for beyond-visual-range (BVR) combat, meaning India would have to overhaul its missile inventory to accommodate US weapons. Unlike the Su-30MKI, which was modified to carry BrahMos, or the Rafale, which uses Meteor and SCALP, the F-35 would require explicit US approval for integrating any non-NATO-standard missiles. This restriction could severely limit India’s ability to develop and deploy indigenous or foreign weapon systems on the platform.
Even more concerning is the fact that the F-35’s mission systems, electronic warfare suite, and flight software are entirely classified and locked by the United States. If India were to operate the jet, the Indian Air Force would not have full access to modify or upgrade its software without Lockheed Martin’s oversight. This effectively makes India reliant on US permissions for software updates, weapons integration, and even operational modifications. In a conflict scenario, if the US decides to withhold certain capabilities, India would have no recourse. This is a direct compromise on India’s strategic autonomy, making the F-35 less of a sovereign asset and more of a leased platform under US control.
While the F-35 is a highly advanced fighter, its deep reliance on US-controlled logistics, weapons, and software makes it a questionable choice for a country like India, which prioritizes strategic autonomy. The Rafale and Su-30MKI offer more flexibility in terms of weapons integration and operational control, making them more suitable for India’s long-term defense strategy. Unless significant changes are made to the F-35’s operational independence, India may find itself locked into a rigid, US-dominated military framework—something that runs counter to its national security objectives.
NOTE: AFI is a proud outsourced content creator partner of IDRW.ORG. All content created by AFI is the sole property of AFI and is protected by copyright. AFI takes copyright infringement seriously and will pursue all legal options available to protect its content.